---layout: posttitle: What is natamycinauthor: Joe Schwarczsource: McGill Blogs---HYPERLINK"http://blogs.mcgill.ca/oss/2016/03/10/you-asked-what-is-natamycin/"You Asked: What is natamycin?βThe customer is always right,β is a time-honoured adage inmarketing. It holds true even if the customer is wrong. If the customerdoes not want βartificialβ preservativesβ in food, industry willcomply, whether that move is supported by science or not. Of course nocompany wants to poison its customers, so eliminating preservatives is arisky business. Whatβs the answer? Look for a βnaturalβpreservative. That will satisfy the consumer who has a disdain foranything artificial, and at the same time will reduce the worry for theproducer about marketing an unsafe product.Kraft, for example, has announced that, at least in the U.S., it will bereplacing artificial preservatives with natural ones in its cheeseproducts. This boils down to not much more than a question of semantics.Sorbic acid and its salts, the βartificialβ preservatives that havebeen used, are to be replaced by natamycin, an antifungal compoundproduced by soil bacteria. Although many cheeses are actually mouldripened, with blue cheese being the classic example, cheese is alsoprone to infection by a variety of rogue moulds that can cause spoilage.Sorbic acid and its salts can prevent the growth of moulds, yeast andfungi, even when used at concentrations of less than 0.1%. It was backin 1859 that Professor August Wilhelm Hofmann first isolated sorbic acidby distilling the oil obtained from the berries of the rowan tree. Thisis the same Professor Hofmann who was enticed to England by PrinceAlbert to head up the newly created Royal College of Chemistry and whoessentially founded the synthetic dye industry.So, doesnβt the fact that sorbic acid can be isolated from berriesmake it a βnaturalβ substance? Yes. And I suppose there would be noclamoring to remove it from food if this is how it were produced. Butdistilling sorbic acid from rowan berries is not an economical processand would not do for the estimated 30,000 tons needed every year by thefood industry. But sorbic acid can also be readily produced by a numberof synthetic methods, including the reaction of crotonaldehyde withketene, both of which can be made from compounds isolated frompetroleum. This synthesis is economically viable and is the way thatsorbic acid is produced. Any chemical is defined by its molecularstructure which does not depend on the route by which it was produced.The sorbic acid produced by the rowan berry is identical to the sorbicacid produced by chemical synthesis, but because the latter was notextracted from a natural source, it is termed βartificial,β andtherefore in the eyes of some people, suspect. The fact is that sorbicacid, irrelevant of the source, is a food additive that has passed allthe regulatory hurdles just like its replacement, natamycin.Natamycin is an antifungal agent produced by a soil bacterium that wasfirst found in South Africaβs Natal province, hence the name. Sincebacteria occur in nature, any of the chemicals they crank out can beclassified as βnatural.β But curiously a substance that occurs innature, like sorbic acid, is termed an artificial preservative when itis synthesized in the lab. Natamycin may be natural, but it would not beso appealing to people if they knew they were eating the waste productof dirt bacteria. Not that there is anything wrong with that.Joe Schwarcz PhD β March 10th/2016